I do not like the concept of (continuously) "getting a life".
It implies that the thing you are spending most of your effort (e.g. time) on is not what you actually want/like/prefer/... .
I do not like the concept of (continuously) "getting a life".
It implies that the thing you are spending most of your effort (e.g. time) on is not what you actually want/like/prefer/... .
I like to keep memories, not things.
To laugh often and love much,
To win the respect of intelligent people and the affection of children,
To earn the appreciation of honest critics and endure the betrayal of false friends,
To appreciate beauty,
To find the best in others,
To leave the world a bit better, whether by a healthy child, a garden path, or a redeemed social condition,
To know even one life has breathed easier because you have lived.This is to have succeeded.
Make me sad, make me sleep, make me question,
give me things that can calm this depression.
Concluding this, the theory states that both the counterfactual statements ``If A had not been open, we would not have seen the man with the hamburger'' and ``If A had not been open, B would have been open'' should not be accepted.
If after working this out I still have any such thing as intuitions or opinions about these counterfactuals, then I very much agree with this result: When constructing a possible world in which A had not been open, to keep our thoughts consistent, we do not necessarily need to remove the hamburger-man and we do not necessarily need to open the other snackbar.
All we need to do, is do at least one of these things.