Schlagwort: Logik

Time is overrated.

Kurz umschauen dass auch keine Linguist_innen in der Nähe sind ...

*duck* und weg.

Bisimulation seems possible, though.

Human relationships are not and will never be symmetric - neither quantitatively nor qualitatively. It is impossible to spend the exact same amount of time thinking about each other, to feel the exact same way about each other, to look at each other in the same way or to do the exact same things together.

Accepting this feels surprisingly freeing.

Not satisfied.

Ich habe, mich niemals durch die Erklärung, welche die Logiker von einem Urteile überhaupt geben, befriedigen können: es ist, wie sie sagen, die Vorstellung eines Verhältnisses zwischen zwei Begriffen.

I have never been able to satisfy myself with the explanation that the logicians give of a judgement in general: it is, they say, the representation of a relation between two concepts.

I. Kant - Kritik der reinen Vernunft / Critique of Pure Reason

I love you too.

Jack tells Jill, ‘I love you too’. He could mean any one of several things, (a) that just as Jill loves him, so he loves her, (b) that he loves Jill and someone else too, (c) that like someone else, he too loves Jill, or (d) that he has love as well as some other feeling for Jill.

Kent Bach: Semantic nonspecificity and mixed quantifiers

Still thinking in circles.

This led to the rapid development of sentential logic and first-order predicate logic, subsuming syllogistic reasoning, which was, therefore, after 2000 years, suddenly considered obsolete by many[original research?]. The Aristotelian system is explicated in modern fora of academia primarily in introductory material and historical study.

One notable exception to this modern relegation is the continued application of Aristotelian logic by officials of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, and the Apostolic Tribunal of the Roman Rota, which still requires that arguments crafted by Advocates be presented in syllogistic format.

Wikipedia